And who among the feminists fought it out with the redstockings? If they did, it didn't last long. Like lemmings they all went along, and now we are paying the price.
Reeves is only a troll from Democrts. First, we need to liberate men from women. Women extract money from men througth the tax system. Men are even funding women Universities!
That the reason why men have live to the rigth. Destroy the State, and you would destroy feminism.
I agree with you, Tony. I have the same misgivings. Sometimes it seems Richard believes that remediating an unjust privilege enjoyed by women would constitute his verboten zero-sum, ignoring the positive-sum removal of the negativity men feel about lack of fairness. Thanks for commenting.
And who among the feminists fought it out with the redstockings? If they did, it didn't last long. Like lemmings they all went along, and now we are paying the price.
Reeves is only a troll from Democrts. First, we need to liberate men from women. Women extract money from men througth the tax system. Men are even funding women Universities!
That the reason why men have live to the rigth. Destroy the State, and you would destroy feminism.
Often when feminists talk about male entitlements, they sometimes sound like spoiled children - "This stuff is all ours and we aren't sharing!"
I fear Reeves has the same position in mind - where any attempt to limit bias and privilege is dismissed.
I agree with you, Tony. I have the same misgivings. Sometimes it seems Richard believes that remediating an unjust privilege enjoyed by women would constitute his verboten zero-sum, ignoring the positive-sum removal of the negativity men feel about lack of fairness. Thanks for commenting.
Thanks for posting this, Jack.
Thanks for the thanks, Steven. And thanks to you for @PatriarchyCtrl on X.